Reuse
Classes P1 (85% or more of nameplate power) and P2 (80–85%), with no critical defects in electroluminescence and sound insulation. They are sold with measured power as refurbished panels.
Modules from repowering and decommissioning
Ecobaterías tests, repairs, refurbishes and reuses lithium batteries and solar panels, and manages the recycling of whatever can no longer be used, with pickup anywhere in Chile.
Updated September 26, 2026 · Reviewed by the Ecobaterías technical team
+56 9 4011 8111 · We reply within 48 business hours.
1,430 to 3,125 silicon modules and 55 to 83 metric tons, depending on panel power: 700 W for a current module, 320 W for one installed between 2014 and 2017.
Our own calculation from JinkoSolar and Trina Solar datasheets. See the table by technology.
Source: Ecobaterías Solar Observatory · cut-off of 2026-09-11. Years are power purchase agreement expiries, not closures announced by the owners.
When a solar plant is repowered, Ecobaterías tests the modules being removed at the plant (electroluminescence, I-V curve and insulation), by sampling or module by module, and sorts them into four routes: reuse, repair, off-grid use or recycling. Each megawatt of silicon panels equals 1,430 to 3,125 modules and 55 to 83 metric tons, depending on panel power. We coordinate pickup with licensed hazardous-waste transport and close every batch with a test report and a valorization certificate for Supreme Decree (DS) 22/2025.
Repowering a plant means increasing its nameplate capacity by replacing components with new equipment, mainly modules and inverters. Revamping also replaces components, but to restore performance without substantially changing nameplate capacity or using new land. Both definitions come from the T13-37 report (2026) of IEA-PVPS, the photovoltaic program of the International Energy Agency. Decommissioning is the complete removal of the plant.
In all three cases modules come out, and a test, not the age of the plant, decides where they go. More technical terms are in the glossary.
| Project | What is replaced | Nameplate capacity | Modules that come out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repowering | Modules and inverters, with new equipment | Increases | The whole array or part of it |
| Revamping | Damaged or underperforming components | Barely changes | Those being replaced |
| Decommissioning | The whole plant | Removed | All of them |
Swipe to see the full table
Source: IEA-PVPS, report T13-37 (2026), table 3 (opens in a new tab), for the definitions of repowering and revamping.
SolarPower Europe’s operation and maintenance guidelines (version 6.0) group the reasons into four:
In Chile, power purchase agreements (PPAs) expiring add a fifth driver. When a PPA expires, the owner can renew it, sell the energy on the market or repower; in all three cases someone has to decide what happens to the installed modules. According to the Ecobaterías Solar Observatory, the flow of removed modules stays between 55,000 and 80,000 a year through 2029 and rises to between 400,000 and 850,000 in the years when PPAs expire (2030 and 2033–2035). The plant-by-plant detail is in the timeline.
Sources: SolarPower Europe, O&M Best Practice Guidelines v6.0 (opens in a new tab) · Ecobaterías Solar Observatory, cut-off of 2026-09-11.
It depends on the power and weight of each module. A plant with 320 W panels removes more than twice as many modules per MW as one with current 700 W panels, and about 50% more tons.
| Reference module | Power | Weight | Modules per MW | Tons per MW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72-cell polycrystalline, 2014–2017 (JinkoSolar JKM320PP-72) | 320 W | 26.5 kg | 3,125 | ≈83 t |
| Monocrystalline PERC, QUASAR project base case | 540–550 W | ≈32.6 kg | ≈1,835 | ≈60 t |
| Bifacial glass-glass TOPCon (Trina Solar Vertex N) | 700 W | 38.3 kg | ≈1,429 | ≈55 t |
| Cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin film (First Solar Series 4) | 92.5–117.5 W | 12 kg | 8,500–10,800 | ≈100–130 t |
Swipe to see the full table
Source: our own calculation from the datasheets of JinkoSolar JKM320PP-72 (opens in a new tab), Trina Solar Vertex N (opens in a new tab) and First Solar Series 4 (opens in a new tab), and the base case of the QUASAR project, D2.2 (2025) (opens in a new tab). IRENA (2016) cites earlier studies that used 100 t per MW as a first approximation.
Two Chilean references: El Romero (Vallenar) has 776,000 polycrystalline silicon modules across 246 MWp, operating since November 2016, which works out to about 3,150 modules per MWp at 317 W on average. Amanecer Solar CAP (Copiapó) has more than 310,000 modules across 100 MW, operating since June 2014.
Example: repowering 100 MW of 320 W modules removes about 312,500 modules and close to 8,300 metric tons. For transport planning, a current 2.28 × 1.13 m module weighs 32 kg; a factory pallet holds 36 modules (≈1.15 t) and a 40-foot high-cube container holds 720 (≈23 t).
Sources: Acciona Energía, El Romero plant (opens in a new tab) · Power Technology, Amanecer Solar CAP (opens in a new tab) · JinkoSolar, Tiger Neo 72HL4-BDV datasheet (2025) (opens in a new tab). The totals in the example are our own calculation.
Testing decides where each module goes, and it happens at the plant, before the batch moves. Our method is aligned with the draft of IEC PAS 63525, the first International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) document on PV module reuse. It is not published yet: in August 2026 it was in the final approval stage. According to the IEA-PVPS summary, the draft sets out two approaches:
At a minimum, the sample goes through four tests: maximum power at standard test conditions (STC: 1,000 W/m² and 25 °C), measured on the I-V curve, which relates the module’s current and voltage; electroluminescence (EL), an image of the light the module emits when current is injected in the dark, which reveals microcracks and inactive cells; a detailed visual inspection; and wet leakage, which measures insulation with the module wetted in a conductive solution.
| Test | What it detects | Reference standard | Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Infrared thermography, with the plant operating | Hot spots, disconnected cell groups, active diodes | IEC TS 62446-3:2017 | Irradiance ≥ 600 W/m² and wind below 28 km/h (17 mph); a cell more than 40 K above its neighbors is a safety-relevant anomaly (class 3) |
| Visual inspection | Broken glass, burn marks, delamination, damaged junction box | IEC 61215-2:2021 (MQT 01) | At least 1,000 lux; rejects major visual defects |
| I-V curve | Maximum power (Pmax), open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current (Isc) and fill factor | IEC 60904-1; correction to STC with IEC 60891:2021 | Power against nameplate: classes P1, P2 and P3 |
| Electroluminescence | Microcracks, broken or inactive cells, broken fingers | IEC TS 60904-13:2018 | Images at short-circuit current and at one tenth of it |
| Dry insulation and wet leakage | Insulation faults in the backsheet or the junction box | IEC 61215-2:2021 (MQT 03 and MQT 15) | ≥ 40 MΩ·m² for modules larger than 0.1 m² |
| Bypass diodes | Open or shorted diode | Voc measurement (procedure cited by IEA-PVPS) | A Voc of 2/3 points to one cell group out of circuit |
Swipe to see the full table
Sources: IEC TS 62446-3:2017 (opens in a new tab) · IEC 61215-2:2021, preview (opens in a new tab) · IEC 60891:2021 (opens in a new tab) · IEC TS 60904-13:2018 (opens in a new tab) · IEA-PVPS T13-10:2018 (opens in a new tab) · Millennial Solar, wet leakage (opens in a new tab) · IEA-PVPS T13-37:2026 (opens in a new tab) · IEC PAS 63525 status at iss.rs (opens in a new tab).
Why wet leakage and not just dry insulation? In a 2026 study of 37 modules from utility-scale plants, 8.1% failed dry and 21.6% failed wet. In Australia, of 3,749 decommissioned modules analyzed by ANU and CSIRO, 58.1% passed, with a median remaining service life of about 12 years; of those that passed the I-V curve and electroluminescence, about 14% failed wet leakage.
Sources: Sustainability 18(3):1212, 2026 (opens in a new tab) · pv magazine, 2026-08-19 (opens in a new tab).
In our laboratory, testing one module takes about 6 minutes, and one day covers 50 to 100 modules. That is testing capacity, not a committed lead time: at the plant, the pace depends on access and the dismantling plan. The full scope of each test is on solar panel testing.
Source: Ecobaterías testing protocol · 2026-09-18.
Testing assigns each module to one of four routes. The power classes are Ecobaterías’ own threshold, measured against nameplate power; the IEC standards are the method, not a certification of ours.
Classes P1 (85% or more of nameplate power) and P2 (80–85%), with no critical defects in electroluminescence and sound insulation. They are sold with measured power as refurbished panels.
A fault in the junction box, a bypass diode (the one that routes current around a failing cell group), cables or connectors. It is repaired and retested, including wet leakage. What can be fixed.
Class P3 (70–80% of nameplate power): suitable for uses not connected to the grid, subject to what Chile’s Superintendency of Electricity and Fuels (Superintendencia de Electricidad y Combustibles, SEC) requires.
Below 70% of nameplate power, broken glass, delamination reaching the edge or insulation that cannot be fixed. It goes to solar panel recycling with a certificate.
Source: Ecobaterías testing protocol · 2026-09-18. Our own classification, measured against a calibrated reference; it is not a standard.
According to the European QUASAR project, at least half of the modules replaced in a repowering are usually in reasonable condition for reuse. For partial repowering, QUASAR recommends replacing more modules than strictly needed and keeping the healthy ones as spares. Replacing diodes, junction boxes, cables and connectors are mature repairs (technology readiness level 9) done in the field. According to Suncycle, as cited by IEA-PVPS, junction box and diode repairs succeed in about 90% of recent modules and 75% of heavily aged ones.
Grid connection. The SEC authorizes modules by brand and model, based on new-product IEC 61215 and IEC 61730 certificates (SEC Exempt Resolution 32,427/2020), and its technical instruction RGR No. 02/2024 prohibits installing modules with breaks or cracks. There is no authorization path for used or refurbished modules. Every module we reuse keeps its brand, model and nameplate; the installation declared to the SEC is defined by the licensed electrical installer. We recommend checking with the SEC before connecting used modules to the grid. Off-grid installations are not exempt either: instruction ITG RIC No. 9.1 sets the same requirement. Modules with broken glass are neither sold nor repaired.
Sources: QUASAR, D2.2 (2025) (opens in a new tab) · IEA-PVPS T13-37:2026 (opens in a new tab) · SEC Exempt Resolution 32,427/2020 (opens in a new tab) · SEC, RGR No. 02/2024 (opens in a new tab) · SEC, ITG RIC No. 9.1 (opens in a new tab).
Testing comes before dispatch so that each module leaves the plant only once, sorted by route: what will be reused travels protected, and what will be recycled goes straight to its destination. Packaging and shipping documents are covered in collection and transport of batteries and panels.
| Task | Owner or its contractor (EPC or O&M) | Ecobaterías |
|---|---|---|
| Plant data and history | Provides them | Defines the test plan |
| On-site testing | Provides access and a work window | Tests and issues the report |
| Dismantling and packaging | Dismantles and packs | Provides the instructions for each route |
| Storage at the plant | Keeps the pallets covered, dry and labeled | Sets the pickup order |
| Declaration document (SIDREP) | Issues it as the waste generator | Provides the transport and destination details |
| Transport | Provides access for loading | Coordinates pickup with licensed hazardous-waste transport |
| Certificates | Uses them in its reporting | Issues the intake, traceability and valorization certificate |
Swipe to see the full table
EPC is the project’s engineering, procurement and construction contractor; O&M, the operation and maintenance company. During dismantling we ask crews to follow these rules:
Sources: JinkoSolar, storage instructions (2024) (opens in a new tab) · JinkoSolar, installation manual V11 (2026) (opens in a new tab) · QUASAR, D2.2 (2025) (opens in a new tab) · Chilean Ministry of the Environment, Exempt Resolution 3413/2025 (opens in a new tab).
The secondary market grows with repowering. According to pv magazine, the Dutch platform Search4Solar gathered more than 150,000 used modules in 2025, most of them from repowering projects. According to IEA-PVPS, SOLARCYCLE powers its plant in Odessa (Texas) with a 500 kW system built from about 1,000 retired modules, which covers roughly half of its demand. In Brazil, 23-year-old polycrystalline modules kept 87–88% of their nameplate power, and 68% were fit for a second life.
The route A modules we sell come with their measured power, an electroluminescence image and an insulation test, plus a 1-year seller’s warranty. Each one keeps its brand, model and nameplate. More detail on used and refurbished solar panels and testing and reuse of decommissioned panels.
One point to check before tendering: according to the Ministry of Energy’s Circular Economy in Energy Roadmap, manufacturer warranties generally do not allow modules to be repaired or reused.
Sources: pv magazine, 2026-04-10 (opens in a new tab) · IEA-PVPS T13-37:2026 (opens in a new tab) · pv magazine, 2026-03-31 (opens in a new tab) · Chilean Ministry of Energy, Circular Economy in Energy Roadmap 2026–2030 (opens in a new tab).
What cannot be reused or repaired is recycled. By weight, a silicon module is 76% glass, 10% polymers (encapsulant and backsheet), 8% aluminum, 5% silicon and 1% copper, with less than 0.1% silver: 6 to 10 grams per panel.
In the industry, recycling starts by removing the aluminum frame, the junction box and the cables. The glass is then separated from the laminate by shredding, with a hot knife at 180–200 °C or by pyrolysis at 300–600 °C, and finally silver, copper and silicon are recovered, usually by chemical means.
For route D modules, we prepare the batch (dismantling and sorting) and manage its valorization with authorized receivers, in Chile or in OECD countries where applicable; EcoBaterías SpA closes the SIDREP declaration as the receiving facility and issues the valorization certificate. The certificate states the number of modules, the mass received and the destination of each fraction. Details are on solar panel recycling in Chile.
DS 22/2025, published on May 7, 2026, sets collection and recovery targets for photovoltaic modules, enforceable 24 months later (May 2028): 10% in the third year (2030) and 50% from the tenth (2037). It is the only target under Law No. 20,920 measured against the estimated waste of each year rather than against what was placed on the market. The decree also requires photovoltaic installations above 1 MW to report their panels in use and projected waste every year, before May 31, in the RETC, Chile’s Pollutant Release and Transfer Register. A repowering changes both figures, and the batch certificate is the evidence behind that report.
Sources: IRENA and IEA-PVPS, End-of-Life Management: Solar Photovoltaic Panels (2016) (opens in a new tab) · IEA-PVPS T12-31:2025 (opens in a new tab) · DS 22/2025, Diario Oficial, 2026-05-07 (opens in a new tab) · País Circular, 2026-09-09 (opens in a new tab).
By default, yes. According to the Chilean Ministry of Energy’s Circular Economy in Energy Roadmap 2026–2030, end-of-life or damaged panels are handled as hazardous waste unless they are declassified under Supreme Decree (DS) 148/2003, Chile’s health regulation on hazardous waste management. The classification depends on the tests for each model: IRENA reports leachate of up to 11 mg/L of lead from silicon modules, above the 5 mg/L limit in DS 148 (art. 14). CdTe modules contain cadmium and tellurium, which DS 148 lists as hazardous constituents; in Chile, Luz del Norte has more than 1.7 million of these modules across 141 MWac.
| Topic | Rule | Article |
|---|---|---|
| Management plan | Mandatory for anyone generating, per year, more than 12 kg of acutely toxic waste or more than 12 metric tons of other hazardous waste. If the modules from 1 MW (55 to 83 t) are handled as hazardous waste, they already exceed that threshold. | 25 |
| Storage | Up to 6 months, extendable once for the same period with a technical report. | 31 |
| Transport | The carrier needs a health permit from the Seremi de Salud (Chile’s regional health authority); the declaration document and safety sheets travel on board. | 36 and 39 |
| Declaration | The generator issues the declaration document; the receiver confirms receipt within 24 hours and each party keeps its copy for 2 years. | 81 and 83 |
Swipe to see the full table
In that chain, we coordinate licensed transport and an authorized destination for each route, and we hand over the documents. The declaration is filed by the owner as the waste generator, using the data we provide.
SEIA. The owner can ask Chile’s Environmental Assessment Service (SEA) whether the repowering must enter the Environmental Impact Assessment System (SEIA) through a relevance consultation (consulta de pertinencia, DS 40, art. 26). The SEA’s relevance portal lists consultations from photovoltaic plants. The filing belongs to the owner; we provide the module count, their destination and the pickup traceability.
Sources: Chilean Ministry of Energy, Circular Economy in Energy Roadmap 2026–2030 (opens in a new tab) · DS 148/2003, Library of the National Congress of Chile (opens in a new tab) · IRENA and IEA-PVPS (2016) (opens in a new tab) · Business Wire, Luz del Norte (2015) (opens in a new tab) · DS 40, SEIA regulation (opens in a new tab) · SEA, relevance consultation portal (opens in a new tab).
PPA expiries line up with the DS 22/2025 targets: the first target, 10%, falls in 2030, the same year as the first large expiry.
2026-05-07
Collection and recovery targets for photovoltaic modules, enforceable 24 months later.
May 2028
The decree’s targets and associated obligations take effect.
2030
The power purchase agreement of a plant with 776,000 modules expires. DS 22/2025 target: 10%.
2033
Power purchase agreement expiry.
2034
Power purchase agreement expiries.
2035
Power purchase agreement expiry.
2037
First plant at the end of its technical life. DS 22/2025 target: 50%.
Sources: Ecobaterías Solar Observatory, cut-off of 2026-09-11 · DS 22/2025, Diario Oficial, 2026-05-07 (opens in a new tab). These are power purchase agreement expiries, not closures announced by the owners.
In 2030 and from 2033 to 2035, the Observatory estimates 400,000 to 850,000 modules removed per year. It pays to set the destination of the modules in the repowering tender documents, before awarding the dismantling work: that way testing fits into the construction schedule instead of delaying it.
Quoted per project. These are the variables that move the figure:
Testing, pickup and certificate lead times are confirmed in the quote. The published price of 22 UF (Chile’s inflation-indexed unit of account) per tonne plus VAT (19%) applies to lithium-ion battery intake and does not apply to photovoltaic modules. To get a quote, use the repowering contact form with the MW, module model and count, year and location. We reply within 48 business hours. All our battery and panel services are listed under services.
More answers in our FAQ on lithium batteries and solar panels.
Updated September 26, 2026 · Reviewed by the Ecobaterías technical team
Tell us the MW, module model and count, year and location. We will propose the test plan and the batch routes within 48 business hours.
Electroluminescence, I-V curve, thermography and insulation, with a report per module.
Modules with measured power, an EL image and an insulation test before sale.
Pickup, handling and a valorization certificate for modules that can no longer be used.
Packaging, licensed transport and shipping documents across Chile.
Targets, estimated waste and who reports what.
Plants, installed modules and the contract expiry timeline in Chile.